Original Post: December 11, 2007
The President annouced a new plan last week to help borrowers who may go into default on their home loans due to adjustable rate mortgages. it definitely looks like it will help “some” people.
Below are the details of the program, however if you have ARM rate mortgage and would like our office to review it, please feel free to call our office at 1-888-456-5635 or email us at email@example.com to set up an appointment.
Bush subprime plan offers help to 1.2M
By Les Christie, CNNMoney.com staff writer
December 6 2007: 2:43 PM EST
NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) — The Bush administration unveiled a foreclosure relief plan Thursday that the White House said could help 1.2 million distressed homeowners.
In separate announcements, President Bush and Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson said the plan will streamline the mortgage modification process for many distressed borrowers. It will offer “more relief to more homeowners, more quickly,” the president said. And it will include a five-year freeze on interest rates for borrowers current with their monthly payments.
But the freeze is limited. It excludes anyone more than 30 days late at the time the mortgage would be modified or anyone who has been more than 60 days late at any time within the previous 12 months.
It also only covers borrowers with adjustable rate mortgages (ARMs) resetting beginning in 2008 and leaves out any who are judged capable of continuing to make mortgage payments at the higher reset rates.
Borrowers who can’t afford the loan even at low introductory rates also will be ineligible, according to Anne Canfield, executive director of the Consumer Mortgage Coalition, which represents lenders and mortgage servicers. Those borrowers will have to work with servicers on a case-by-case basis to determine if their homes can be saved.
Of the 2.2 million subprime ARMS that are expected to reset through the end of 2008, only 240,000 of those would be covered by the freeze, according to an analysis made by investment banker Barclays Capital as reported in The New York Times.
“I think the plan is good in theory,” said Mark Zandi, chief economist for Moody’s Economy.com, “but, in practice, it’s going to come up short. There are too many impediments to its widespread adoption by investors and servicers.”
Obstacles include contractual obligations between servicers and investors as well as logistical difficulties. When loans have been sliced up and resold through the securitization process, it can be hard to determine who ultimately has the authority to decide what modifications are possible and still in the best interests of the investors.
Furthermore, said Zandi, “There’s no stick in the plan; it depends on moral suasion.”
Help will be available even for many homeowners who won’t benefit under the the administration’s freeze plan, according to Canfield.
“The industry will still work to modify these loans,” she said. “We have every incentive to do that.”
Delinquent loans increase financial pressure on servicers because they still have to make payments to investors, as well as tax payments to local governments, according to Canfield.
The principle aim of the Bush plan is to streamline the modification process, allowing them to get fast help. Lenders will examine readily available loan criteria, such as loan-to-value ratios, loan amount, credit scores and payment history, to make a quick determination of qualifications.
That makes it a “start in the right direction,” said Darla Keegan, speaking for Novadebt, a national nonprofit housing and credit counseling agency, because it will move some borrowers through the system quickly. Mortgage counseling services are currently stretched.
For the rest, she said, “We can still see if lenders will work out agreements with lenders for these borrowers.”
“Qualified borrowers will get their modifications much more quickly,” said Kurt Pfotenhauer, senior vice president for government affairs with the Mortgage Bankers Association. “A whole cohort will be done on an accelerated basis.”
Still, said Bruce Marks, chief executive of the Neighborhood Assistance Corporation of America, a community advocacy group, “The number of borrowers affected by the plan is very small, but it sets the precedent and standard so that more borrowers can be helped down the road.”
He expects more of that help to come. “An important point is why they’re doing it. They’re seeing the numbers of delinquencies. They can’t say publicly that it will have a huge impact on the economy, but this action says that.”
If the impact of subprime foreclosures increases, pressure will build for the government to do more.
The agreement does leap one of the thorniest hurdles to making wholesale mortgage modifications work: resistance from the investment community. Investors were sold a bill of goods, according to John Taylor, CEO of the National Community Reinvestment Coalition.
“They were promised a product that looked very safe and had attractive rates,” he said. “Now they’re getting little or nothing in return and are being asked to take bigger losses.”
As the foreclosure crisis deepened it became apparent that many sensible modifications were being shot down because investors would not agree to them. An analysis by Moody’s earlier this autumn revealed only about 1 percent of resetting ARMs had been modified this year.
The administration had to use its powers of persuasion to get investors aboard at all, according to Don Lampe, a real estate attorney who has testified before Congress on subprime mortgage issues. “Investor push-back probably weakened the plan,” he said.
Despite all the criticism, the initiative was welcomed by nearly all the players, including consumer groups. Many wish it were stronger but were happy to see some response from the administration.
As Lampe put it, “Perfection is the enemy of progress.”
The president also used the announcement as an opportunity to call on Congress to act more expeditiously on passing mortgage relief legislation, including the FHA Modernization bill, changes in the tax code, so lender concessions to borrowers are not taxed as income, and a bill enabling local and state governments to issue bonds to finance mortgage refinancings. All have been bottled up in the Senate for weeks or months.